Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Letter: Classic Advice for a Bacchanal (Updated)

Classics Department Associate Professor and Chair

Published: Sunday, April 1, 2012

Updated: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 22:04

Dear Editor,

How glad I am to be on a campus with an active and strong LGBTQ community! I read with interest your Facebook advertisement for your upcoming party, the Bacchanal, and I have every wish that the event will be a success. It’s been a long time coming, and you deserve it.

That said, as a public service to any and all groups that have had or will have the notion of hosting classical-antiquity-themed events, here are some ground rules to follow from now until the end of time.

(1) The Greeks did not wear togas, especially not Greek gods. You're thinking of the Romans. Please do not ever associate "Greeks" and "togas" again. If, however, you want to advertise your party with the catchphrase, "We put the TOGA in Saratoga," go ahead. You're welcome.

(2) The word "Bacchanal" is, ultimately, a Latin word, derived from the name of the god Bacchus. Bacchus, as you seem to be aware, was the god of wine and of partying in general. (Though there is more to him than that.) However, since he's more famous as a Roman god, it's very unlikely that Greek gods would show up to his party. Hence, please encourage your attendees to unleash their inner Venus (the Roman Aphrodite) instead -- if she must be unleashed in public and all that.

(3) Apollo is an exception to this rule, since Apollo's Roman name is also Apollo. So encouraging folks to unleash their inner Apollo at a Bacchanal is fine -- provided that you remember he is a god of enlightenment rather than drunken revelry. In fact, he's usually so busy providing oracles, making prophecies, and healing the sick, that I doubt he has time for too many parties. Hence, unleashing one's inner Apollo at a Bacchanal might not be the thing, unless you're looking to end the party. That bright orb that stings your eyes the morning after and calls you back to reason? THAT'S Apollo. Invite him at your own risk.

(3a) Also, the laurel wreath is Apollo's emblem. Hence, when you urge your prospective audience to "think laurel wreaths," you are in fact inviting them to behave like Apollo. (See my remarks under number 3, above.) Please encourage them to "think ivy wreaths" instead: ivy is Bacchus' plant.

(4) You do know that you have a picture of Mercury in the upper left-hand corner of the Bacchanal Facebook page, right? Just checking. On the one hand, he's an apt messenger to get the word out about your event. On the other hand, when you call your event the Bacchanal, it's a little jarring not to see Bacchus himself, or at least his minions: a satyr here, a maenad there. I've mentioned ivy. Consider also a leopard or a stalk of fennel topped with what looks like a pine cone. Or a deer being torn to pieces. If tonight you're going to party like it's 99, then please at least use the appropriate iconography. I'll be watching for the posters.

(5) Thank you in advance for not using Greek sigmas (our s-equivalent) as the letter E to make things look more Greeky and stuff. You know: GRΣΣKY. Don't do that. (You didn’t.) It is rumored that such offenses against the language will cause Alexander the Great to rise from the dead and take names. That wouldn't be so bad -- especially if he came looking like Colin Farrell or even Richard Burton -- but (pro tip) you really don't want to hedge your bets when Alex is in one of his moods. For instruction in the proper usage of Greek letters, I invite everyone to take CG 110: Elementary Greek this fall.

(6) So far, I’ve dished out what I hope will be perceived as good-natured snark. But let me be serious for a moment. Here is perhaps the most important rule of all for any Bacchanal, and one the Greeks and the Romans understood very well: nothing in excess. Forget what you've seen on Spartacus: Blood and Sand or HBO: Rome. To truly shatter some stereotypes, have a party that remains safe in all senses of the word. Safe for people to be themselves without judgment, and safe for everyone’s health and well-being. We the faculty and staff (if I can say it myself) care more about your safety and your sanity than you might imagine. This is our campus, too.

(7) Did I mention that the Greeks did not wear togas?

Your compliance with the above rules will be appreciated, both now and in perpetuity.

 

Wishing you a safe and sound Bacchanal,

Dan Curley

Associate Professor and Chair

Classics Department

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Anonymous
Mon Apr 9 2012 14:10
"So what did the Ancient Greeks wear, if not togas? Now I'm curious and WANT TO KNOW."

The Chiton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiton_(costume)

Daniel Perett
Sun Apr 8 2012 14:11
I thought this was a wonderfully funny piece. Thanks so much for writing it!

To those who are annoyed by it - look, every specialist in anything at all (not just academics) usually has a set of pet peeves about the way what they do or what they study is popularly misrepresented. It's sort of like how people sigh when they see the region they're from being misrepresented in yet *another* film. If they rant about it and act superior or mean-spirited, then they do indeed make themselves annoying. But if they turn those pet peeves into a kind and witty set of reminders, we should just enjoy it and laugh as they are inviting us to.

JustAMusician
Sun Apr 8 2012 12:48
I really enjoyed this little article! Cute, funny, and interesting. I'm glad I have a sense of humor, unlike some of the bitchy commenters.

Rock on, DC!

Anonymous
Sun Apr 8 2012 11:04
Dan Curley: "Did I mention that the Greeks did not wear togas?"

So what did the Ancient Greeks wear, if not togas? Now I'm curious and WANT TO KNOW.

You don't want to hold out on me when I WANT TO KNOW!

.

esg
Sun Apr 8 2012 05:42
Discussing a little bit of historical knowledge is deserving of scorn, evidently, to judge by previous comments. I for one welcome the conversation, not least because it's actually rather fun.
Jim L.
Sat Apr 7 2012 21:50
...linked here from Andrew Sullivan's blog and well worth the read. hilarious! Prof. Curley has a comedy writing gig waiting if the undergrads or tenure become tedious... btw, when I was at U.W., our humanities course had instead a Saturnalia w/a roasted pig. perhaps that's what the toga'd Skidmore LGBTer's really need to do.
Anonymous
Sat Apr 7 2012 19:32
maybe the most annoyingly pretentious thing ive ever read
Anonymous
Sat Apr 7 2012 19:16
This is why people hate classicists.

Sincerely,

A recovering classicist

Anonymous
Fri Apr 6 2012 17:53
P.S. Famae volent.
Dan Curley
Wed Apr 4 2012 22:28
Lahir,

My Middle Liddell (that's the medium-sized standard ancient Greek Dictionary, non-classicists) says that thyrsa is a proper heterogeneous plural for thyrsos. I don't have the Large Lidell to hand.

Folks, I can abide snark directed at me, but please be respectful of other commenters. We have the Fama Volent blog for internecine snippery.

DC

Lahir
Wed Apr 4 2012 21:16
To the first commentator: the plural of "Thyrsus" is not "Thyrsa." The fact that you've wrongly judged so makes me believe you are not a classics major, nor a Greek student, but simply someone who is looking to create an argument. True that Βάκχος is a Greek name, but that is far from the normal name for Dionysus in the Greek pantheon - you might as well be calling Italy "Hesperia" or the Greeks "Δαναοί."

And I have found absolutely no evidence to support your assertion about the pine cones being a misrepresentation of ivy.

Dan Curley
Wed Apr 4 2012 13:36
Thank you, commenters, for your perspicacity and punctiliousness. Goodness knows, the punctilious persona I adopt in my piece should be able to withstand some punctiliousness from without.

I was writing generally for a general audience, so I did not countenance a certain level of detail; but I did appreciate the reminders from commenter 1, and I took the opportunity to revise with them in mind, once I realized that the edits were easily made. No subterfuge was intended.

DC

DC

DC

Anonymous
Tue Apr 3 2012 23:46
I would like to point out that the op-ed has been, er, edited, to make the previous comment seem unfair. The original may be found here:
http://rogueclassicism.com/
Anonymous
Tue Apr 3 2012 14:25
Βάκχος is a Roman god? That would be news to Βάκχος, and Sophocles, and Euripides. Also, since we're being sticklers for the facts here, the thyrsus is not topped with a pine cone. The pine cones you see atop thyrsa in Roman art are a (mis)representation of a tangle of ivy. You know about ivy, so you say.

Good luck getting those numbers up in your Greek classes.





log out